User talk:Hilarious Username - Revision history

Hilarious Username: /* Re:block/resignation message */ new section

2026-03-10T14:32:18Z

Re:block/resignation message: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:32, 10 March 2026
Line 11:		Line 11:

	You undeleted [[Sad Satan]] because you believe it's shock game. If it's a shock game, where's the bait and switch element? I'm asking because I'm considering deleting the page because of downranking issues.--[[User:ScreamerGuy2000\|ScreamerGuy2000]] ([[User talk:ScreamerGuy2000\|talk]]) 00:19, 9 March 2026 (MST)		You undeleted [[Sad Satan]] because you believe it's shock game. If it's a shock game, where's the bait and switch element? I'm asking because I'm considering deleting the page because of downranking issues.--[[User:ScreamerGuy2000\|ScreamerGuy2000]] ([[User talk:ScreamerGuy2000\|talk]]) 00:19, 9 March 2026 (MST)

			== Re:block/resignation message ==

			[[user:Tankmanfan44]] I asked for a straight answer on why the pages were deleted. I didn’t get one. On any decent wiki you would at least need a sensible reason to delete something, and would probably have a system for discussing whether a page is in scope. But you don’t have that. You don’t have article talk pages. You don’t have internal discussion forums and noticeboards. You don’t even have a concrete notion of what the scope of this wiki ''is''. Your wiki lacks the most basic decision-making structures so you compensate by running it like an autocracy. You have rules, but you don’t follow them. You break your own admin conduct standards and basic civility expectations constantly. I expected I would be blocked. I edit warred because my pages were deleted without my input, without any good reason or explanation, and with no recourse, and I was just expected to sit with that because you were in charge and I wasn’t. I liked editing this wiki, but this experience ruined it for me. I sincerely hope you will at least take my advice and implement some basic wiki features like a deletion system that allows debate and user input, discussion forums that aren’t hosted off-wiki, and detailed scope guidelines that actually make sense. I also sincerely hope you’ll actually start following your own conduct standards— stop being so rude, and stop using your admin tools to shut people up when you can’t provide a decent explanation for your actions. If you actually make a wiki that’s worth editing and run in a sensible manner maybe I’ll come back, but for now I am retiring. --[[User:Hilarious Username\|Hilarious Username]] ([[User talk:Hilarious Username\|talk]]) 07:32, 10 March 2026 (MST)

ScreamerGuy2000: /* Sad Satan */

2026-03-09T07:19:41Z

Sad Satan

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:19, 9 March 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:
	== Sad Satan ==		== Sad Satan ==

	You undeleted [[Sad Satan]] because you believe it is s shock game. If it's a shock game, where's the bait and switch element? I'm asking because I'm considering deleting the page because of downranking issues.--[[User:ScreamerGuy2000\|ScreamerGuy2000]] ([[User talk:ScreamerGuy2000\|talk]]) 00:19, 9 March 2026 (MST)		You undeleted [[Sad Satan]] because you believe it's shock game. If it's a shock game, where's the bait and switch element? I'm asking because I'm considering deleting the page because of downranking issues.--[[User:ScreamerGuy2000\|ScreamerGuy2000]] ([[User talk:ScreamerGuy2000\|talk]]) 00:19, 9 March 2026 (MST)

ScreamerGuy2000: /* Sad Satan */ new section

2026-03-09T07:19:25Z

Sad Satan: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:19, 9 March 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	== RE: 1 guy 2 spoons edit ==		== RE: 1 guy 2 spoons edit ==
	There are many articles that allow such speculation which is oblivious to me, but it's fine. The article is just quoting the creepypasta and it barely just doesn't bloat out the article. Could you have it resolve and link it from the outside? Thanks. --[[User:EverlongFF\|EverlongFF]] ([[User talk:EverlongFF\|talk]]) 09:37, 10 February 2025 (MST)		There are many articles that allow such speculation which is oblivious to me, but it's fine. The article is just quoting the creepypasta and it barely just doesn't bloat out the article. Could you have it resolve and link it from the outside? Thanks. --[[User:EverlongFF\|EverlongFF]] ([[User talk:EverlongFF\|talk]]) 09:37, 10 February 2025 (MST)

			== Sad Satan ==

			You undeleted [[Sad Satan]] because you believe it is s shock game. If it's a shock game, where's the bait and switch element? I'm asking because I'm considering deleting the page because of downranking issues.--[[User:ScreamerGuy2000\|ScreamerGuy2000]] ([[User talk:ScreamerGuy2000\|talk]]) 00:19, 9 March 2026 (MST)

Tankmanfan44: Reverted edits by Anthony Man Docando (talk) to last revision by EverlongFF

2025-08-03T22:23:45Z

Reverted edits by Anthony Man Docando (talk) to last revision by EverlongFF

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 3 August 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:
	== RE: 1 guy 2 spoons edit ==		== RE: 1 guy 2 spoons edit ==
	There are many articles that allow such speculation which is oblivious to me, but it's fine. The article is just quoting the creepypasta and it barely just doesn't bloat out the article. Could you have it resolve and link it from the outside? Thanks. --[[User:EverlongFF\|EverlongFF]] ([[User talk:EverlongFF\|talk]]) 09:37, 10 February 2025 (MST)		There are many articles that allow such speculation which is oblivious to me, but it's fine. The article is just quoting the creepypasta and it barely just doesn't bloat out the article. Could you have it resolve and link it from the outside? Thanks. --[[User:EverlongFF\|EverlongFF]] ([[User talk:EverlongFF\|talk]]) 09:37, 10 February 2025 (MST)

	~~== Talking about an article that stayed for 12 days and got suddenly deleted ==~~
	So, uh, remember when encyclopedia admins bring back deleted articles to indicate that they're undeleted? Well, you're one, and because of that, all you have to do is to undelete my article on Andreas Hykade's ''Love & Theft''. Why? Because I'm so sad that it got deleted being a screamer (since the 3:25 timestamp, which has a jumpscare), but before it got deleted, it normally stayed for 12 days last month. So, you must undelete it (because you're an admin), and after that, I'll comment that it will stay here due to the fact that the film counts as a "screamer". Will you please do it? --[[User:Anthony Man Docando\|Anthony Man Docando]] ([[User talk:Anthony Man Docando\|talk]]) 01:31, 04 August 2025 (CET)

Anthony Man Docando at 19:28, 3 August 2025

2025-08-03T19:28:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:28, 3 August 2025
Line 9:		Line 9:

	== Talking about an article that stayed for 12 days and got suddenly deleted ==		== Talking about an article that stayed for 12 days and got suddenly deleted ==
	So, uh, remember when encyclopedia admins bring back deleted articles to indicate that they're undeleted? Well, you're one, and because of that, all you have to do is to undelete my article on Andreas Hykade's ''Love & Theft''. Why? Because I'm so sad that it got deleted being a screamer (since the 3:25 timestamp, which has a jumpscare), but before it got deleted, it normally stayed for 12 days last month. So, you must undelete it (because you're an admin), and after that, I'll comment that it will stay here due to the fact that the film counts as a "screamer". Will you please do it? --[[User:Anthony Man Docando\|Anthony Man Docando]] ([[User talk:Anthony Man Docando\|talk]]) 01:31, 03 August 2025 (CET)		So, uh, remember when encyclopedia admins bring back deleted articles to indicate that they're undeleted? Well, you're one, and because of that, all you have to do is to undelete my article on Andreas Hykade's ''Love & Theft''. Why? Because I'm so sad that it got deleted being a screamer (since the 3:25 timestamp, which has a jumpscare), but before it got deleted, it normally stayed for 12 days last month. So, you must undelete it (because you're an admin), and after that, I'll comment that it will stay here due to the fact that the film counts as a "screamer". Will you please do it? --[[User:Anthony Man Docando\|Anthony Man Docando]] ([[User talk:Anthony Man Docando\|talk]]) 01:31, 04 August 2025 (CET)

Anthony Man Docando at 18:32, 3 August 2025

2025-08-03T18:32:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:32, 3 August 2025
Line 9:		Line 9:

	== Talking about an article that stayed for 12 days and got suddenly deleted ==		== Talking about an article that stayed for 12 days and got suddenly deleted ==
	So, uh, remember when encyclopedia admins bring back deleted articles to indicate that they're undeleted? Well, you're one, and because of that, all you have to do is to undelete my article on Andreas Hykade's ''Love & Theft''. Why? Because I'm so sad that it got deleted being a screamer (since the 3:25 timestamp, which has a jumpscare), but before it got deleted, it normally stayed for 12 days last month. So, you must undelete it (because you're an admin), and after that, I'll comment that it will stay here due to the fact that the film counts as a "screamer". Will you please do it? --[[User:Anthony Man Docando\|Anthony Man Docando]] ([[User talk:Anthony Man Docando\|talk]])		So, uh, remember when encyclopedia admins bring back deleted articles to indicate that they're undeleted? Well, you're one, and because of that, all you have to do is to undelete my article on Andreas Hykade's ''Love & Theft''. Why? Because I'm so sad that it got deleted being a screamer (since the 3:25 timestamp, which has a jumpscare), but before it got deleted, it normally stayed for 12 days last month. So, you must undelete it (because you're an admin), and after that, I'll comment that it will stay here due to the fact that the film counts as a "screamer". Will you please do it? --[[User:Anthony Man Docando\|Anthony Man Docando]] ([[User talk:Anthony Man Docando\|talk]]) 01:31, 03 August 2025 (CET)

Anthony Man Docando at 18:31, 3 August 2025

2025-08-03T18:31:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:31, 3 August 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:
	== RE: 1 guy 2 spoons edit ==		== RE: 1 guy 2 spoons edit ==
	There are many articles that allow such speculation which is oblivious to me, but it's fine. The article is just quoting the creepypasta and it barely just doesn't bloat out the article. Could you have it resolve and link it from the outside? Thanks. --[[User:EverlongFF\|EverlongFF]] ([[User talk:EverlongFF\|talk]]) 09:37, 10 February 2025 (MST)		There are many articles that allow such speculation which is oblivious to me, but it's fine. The article is just quoting the creepypasta and it barely just doesn't bloat out the article. Could you have it resolve and link it from the outside? Thanks. --[[User:EverlongFF\|EverlongFF]] ([[User talk:EverlongFF\|talk]]) 09:37, 10 February 2025 (MST)

			== Talking about an article that stayed for 12 days and got suddenly deleted ==
			So, uh, remember when encyclopedia admins bring back deleted articles to indicate that they're undeleted? Well, you're one, and because of that, all you have to do is to undelete my article on Andreas Hykade's ''Love & Theft''. Why? Because I'm so sad that it got deleted being a screamer (since the 3:25 timestamp, which has a jumpscare), but before it got deleted, it normally stayed for 12 days last month. So, you must undelete it (because you're an admin), and after that, I'll comment that it will stay here due to the fact that the film counts as a "screamer". Will you please do it? --[[User:Anthony Man Docando\|Anthony Man Docando]] ([[User talk:Anthony Man Docando\|talk]])

EverlongFF: /* 1 guy 2 spoons edit */

2025-02-10T16:37:14Z

1 guy 2 spoons edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:37, 10 February 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:

	ok dude, i get with your point, I respect you as an editor, but there's no reason we could start an edit war like that. I wanted to quote-unquote the full snippet and a significant rumor because directing them to external links and without noting any detailed speculation or phenomenon is tasteless. Assuming you might think my edit makes the article out of place but we can talk about this respectfully. --[[User:EverlongFF\|EverlongFF]] ([[User talk:EverlongFF\|talk]]) 09:28, 4 February 2025 (MST)		ok dude, i get with your point, I respect you as an editor, but there's no reason we could start an edit war like that. I wanted to quote-unquote the full snippet and a significant rumor because directing them to external links and without noting any detailed speculation or phenomenon is tasteless. Assuming you might think my edit makes the article out of place but we can talk about this respectfully. --[[User:EverlongFF\|EverlongFF]] ([[User talk:EverlongFF\|talk]]) 09:28, 4 February 2025 (MST)

			== RE: 1 guy 2 spoons edit ==
			There are many articles that allow such speculation which is oblivious to me, but it's fine. The article is just quoting the creepypasta and it barely just doesn't bloat out the article. Could you have it resolve and link it from the outside? Thanks. --[[User:EverlongFF\|EverlongFF]] ([[User talk:EverlongFF\|talk]]) 09:37, 10 February 2025 (MST)

EverlongFF: /* 1 guy 2 spoons edit */ new section

2025-02-04T16:28:21Z

1 guy 2 spoons edit: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 4 February 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Welcome}}		{{Welcome}}

			== 1 guy 2 spoons edit ==

			ok dude, i get with your point, I respect you as an editor, but there's no reason we could start an edit war like that. I wanted to quote-unquote the full snippet and a significant rumor because directing them to external links and without noting any detailed speculation or phenomenon is tasteless. Assuming you might think my edit makes the article out of place but we can talk about this respectfully. --[[User:EverlongFF\|EverlongFF]] ([[User talk:EverlongFF\|talk]]) 09:28, 4 February 2025 (MST)

Lawiki: Created page with "{{Welcome}}"

2024-10-06T06:16:27Z

Created page with "{{Welcome}}"

New page